01
Detect
Identify the security finding, configuration deviation, privileged-access risk or vulnerability that matters.
Secure Cloud · Verified remediation · Operational resilience
From security finding to verified remediation.
Enki Tech helps European organisations turn Microsoft Cloud, identity and operational security risks into controlled technical outcomes—with clear ownership, implemented remediation, verification against agreed acceptance criteria and evidence that can be reused.
The expensive problem
Finding risk is not the same as closing it.
Many organisations already have scanners, security tools, policies and audit reports. The operational failure appears later: unclear ownership, delayed remediation, weak verification and incomplete evidence. Enki Tech focuses on that execution gap—especially across Microsoft 365, Entra ID, Intune, Azure, Exchange, Teams and Defender environments.
Operational control loop
Detect → Prioritize → Assign → Remediate → Verify → Prove
The objective is not another checklist. It is a repeatable route from identified risk to verified closure.
02
Prioritize
Connect technical severity to business context, exposure, affected services and remediation urgency.
03
Assign
Give every material finding a named owner, target SLA, escalation path and decision authority.
04
Remediate
Implement the technical change across Microsoft 365, Entra ID, Intune, Azure, Exchange, Teams or Defender.
05
Verify
Test the remediated state against agreed acceptance criteria and confirm that the intended control is operating.
06
Prove
Preserve the evidence, ownership and closure record needed for governance, audit and future review.
Assess · Fix · Operate
Start with a bounded problem. Expand only where the evidence supports it.
Choose an entry point based on the problem. A CRA reporting exercise is for product manufacturers; Microsoft identity assurance is also available independently.
Assess · Microsoft Cloud
Privileged Identity Assurance
Understand who can reach critical cloud resources, how privileged access is controlled and which gaps need attention first.
You receiveAccess baseline · control evidence · prioritized remediation plan
Explore the identity assessment Assess · Product manufacturers
CRA Incident Reporting Readiness Sprint
Rehearse one product-security event with your Security, Product and Engineering teams. Find delays in ownership, reporting data and evidence retrieval.
You receiveTimed exercise · reporting runbook · owners · evidence gaps
Explore the CRA readiness sprint Fix · Agreed technical scope
Secure Cloud Remediation Sprint
Move selected Microsoft Cloud, identity or endpoint findings through approved changes and technical verification.
You receiveImplemented changes · verification · closure evidence · handover
Scope a remediation sprint Operate · Scheduled assurance
Continuous Secure Cloud Governance
Review agreed controls, privilege and configuration drift at a defined cadence. Keep evidence current and assign new findings to an owner.
You receiveControl review · drift findings · evidence · owned action plan
Explore recurring governance CRA and NIS2
Product reporting and organisational security need different starting points.
We help your technical team deliver the agreed controls, handoffs and evidence. Your regulatory owner confirms which obligations apply.
CRA · Products placed on the EU market
Can your product team assemble reporting data in time?
The Cyber Resilience Act concerns products with digital elements. Article 14 reporting applies from 11 September 2026; the main requirements apply from 11 December 2027.
Start with one product and one reporting scenario. We test timestamps, product mapping, owners and evidence retrieval. A company using Microsoft 365 is not automatically a CRA manufacturer.
Review the CRA sprint scope →NIS2 · Organisations within scope
Can your platform team implement and demonstrate the controls?
The NIS2 Directive covers cybersecurity risk management and significant-incident reporting for specified organisations. Applicability depends on factors including sector, size and national law.
Enki Tech supports the agreed Microsoft workstream: privileged access, cloud configuration, remediation ownership and control evidence. This is one part of an organisation's wider NIS2 programme.
Explore Microsoft identity assurance →The reporting triggers, responsible parties and submission routes differ. A shared evidence process does not replace either obligation. Sources: European Commission CRA reporting guidance, CRA implementation guidance and NIS2 overview. Reviewed 10 September 2026.
Best fit
For teams that need technical closure, not another generic security report.
Regulated or security-conscious organisations running Microsoft Cloud
Teams with audit findings, vulnerabilities or identity risks that are not closing fast enough
Organisations where ownership is split across Security, Infrastructure, Workplace, Product or Compliance
Consultancies, MSSPs and integrators that need a specialist Microsoft remediation and assurance layer
Delivery boundary
Technical delivery with clear responsibilities.
Enki Tech focuses on Microsoft Cloud, identity, collaboration, endpoint, remediation, operational evidence and automation. Where legal interpretation, formal certification, 24/7 SOC coverage or regulated incident-command obligations are required, those responsibilities remain with the client or appropriately authorized specialist partners unless separately contracted.
Close the execution gap
Which security findings are still open because ownership, remediation or evidence is unclear?
Share the Microsoft environment, the finding or backlog, and the required outcome. Enki Tech will identify whether the right first step is a readiness sprint, focused remediation or recurring assurance.